In 2008, two thousand high school students across the country were asked to name the greatest Americans, excluding presidents and presidents’ wives. Their selections reflect our educational system’s priority on minority and women’s studies.
by Michael Naragon
While sitting in the Advanced Placement institute a week ago, the instructor posed a question to the history educators in the room.
“Not counting presidents or their wives,” he began, “who would you consider the five greatest, most influential Americans in history?” My mind began to cycle through the most important figures to grace the stage.
My first choice was John Marshall. As the first significant Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, he established the principle of judicial review, greatly expanding the power of the Court and making the Constitution, according to Jefferson, “a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form they please.”
Next, I chose Benjamin Franklin. The exclusion of presidents ruled out many of the Founding Fathers I would have chosen, but Franklin fit the bill. Many historians credit Franklin as the architect of the American ideal–a merge of the Puritan work ethic and moral compass with the tolerance and reason of Enlightenment philosophy. He served as ambassador to France, securing French support for the Revolution effort, and Postmaster General. Not to mention, he was an accomplished inventor, and many of his creations are still used today in one form or another.
Another name I could not leave off the list was Thomas Edison. Of all the great inventors in American history, no one individual had the impact of Edison. Among his inventions were the light bulb, motion picture camera, phonograph, and the alkaline storage battery, among hundreds of others. He also participated in many projects for the government, including the detection of submarines and the use of sound to determine the range of enemy guns.
I also included Martin Luther King, Jr. in my top five. King was instrumental in the civil rights movement of the 1960s, bringing attention and voice to the segregation present in many parts of the country. His “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” in 1963 cemented his fame. His “I Have A Dream” speech in Washington in August of that same year created his legend.
I was torn with my last choice, so I made none. Leaving out the presidents made it difficult to decide on a fifth person.
I was pleased to hear that my choices were in line with those made by historians across the country. On the historians’ list, in sequential order:
1. Alexander Hamilton – I felt silly that I hadn’t come up with Hamilton.
2. Benjamin Franklin
3. John Marshall
4. Martin Luther King, Jr.
5. Thomas Edison
As you may have guessed, the list provided by the 2,000 high school students did not match mine. Here is the students’ list, in order:
1. Martin Luther King, Jr.
2. Rosa Parks
3. Harriet Tubman
4. Susan B. Anthony
5. Benjamin Franklin
6. Amelia Earhart
7. Oprah Winfrey
8. Marilyn Monroe
9. Thomas Edison
10. Albert Einstein
I’m not going to write that Harriet Tubman was not a great American, or that Rosa Parks wasn’t courageous. You could make the case that Parks, not King, should be considered the most important figure of the civil rights movement.
But for those of you who believe that the education system in America is rolling along nicely and our children are being given a well-rounded education, I present this survey as Exhibit A for the contrary argument.







6 Comments
June 29, 2009 at 8:22 pm
I disagree with your premise. To me these results show the priority of valuation of minorities and women as compared to Whites and men.
It’s more than the amount of studies and the focus of studies. It’s the deliberate shift in how certain contributions to America are being taught to be valued.
June 29, 2009 at 9:17 pm
I don’t believe I said there’s anything wrong with the valuation of minorities and women. In my U.S. classes, we cover every significant figure, regardless of color, creed, or gender, and give them places of prominence in the survey of history.
The danger here is from what I call Affirmative Action history. Because courses did not emphasize women and minorities until after the 1960s, liberal education provides an overcompensation for that lack. In a 2009 classroom, much more emphasis is placed on Harriet Tubman than, perhaps, Benjamin Franklin. You may disagree with the idea that, in terms of history, Franklin was more important, but without Franklin, there is no Tubman. Without John Marshall, for instance, the Court cannot make policy as in the cases of Dred Scott, Brown v. Board, or Roe v. Wade, to name just a few.
Valuation is necessary. Valuation at the expense of other essential figures is committing the same mistake from a different direction.
June 30, 2009 at 11:21 am
We’re not in any way in disagreement. You summed up my point with,
And did so far better than I did myself.
I was responding to your initial statement that seemed to focus the complaint on the amount of study as opposed to the inappropriate shift in valuation of people and the contributions.
June 30, 2009 at 12:39 pm
Oh, I still think there’s a focus/time disparity. Do we spend an entire month on the founding of the country? Is there an entire month dedicated to Native Americans? Rather than treat U.S. history as a story with many characters–some major, some minor–our schools, particularly government elementary programs, focus far more time and effort on Rosa Parks than Alexander Hamilton, if he is mentioned at all. Who did more for America? It’s obviously debatable, but, as with Franklin, if there is no Hamilton, there may be no Rosa Parks. She was a hero, and I spend time discussing her in my classes, but that does not make Alexander Hamilton or Benjamin Franklin merely “White men” who should now be minimized.
You’re right… I don’t believe we’re in any real disagreement, but I still do question the losses of heritage/knowledge we may be suffering due to the backlash of political correctness.
How Oprah made the list is entirely beyond my capacity to explain.
June 29, 2009 at 10:47 pm
[...] This post was Twitted by publius772000 [...]
June 30, 2009 at 2:12 am
[...] This post was Twitted by RIGHTone [...]