<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 220-215: The Unresponsive Socialist House Drives the First Nail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theconstitutionalalamo.com/2009/11/08/220-215-the-unresponsive-socialist-house-drives-the-first-nail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theconstitutionalalamo.com/2009/11/08/220-215-the-unresponsive-socialist-house-drives-the-first-nail/</link>
	<description>Holding out to defend the Republic...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 19:30:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirty Democrats &#187; House votes 220-215 to screw taxpayers, old folks and healthy Americans</title>
		<link>http://theconstitutionalalamo.com/2009/11/08/220-215-the-unresponsive-socialist-house-drives-the-first-nail/#comment-1056</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dirty Democrats &#187; House votes 220-215 to screw taxpayers, old folks and healthy Americans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theconstitutionalalamo.com/?p=1005#comment-1056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] votes 220-215 to screw taxpayers, old folks and healthy Americans: &#8220;The unresponsive socialist house drives the first nail. The destruction of our freedom, prosperity, and future was passed narrowly, 220-215. While illegal [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] votes 220-215 to screw taxpayers, old folks and healthy Americans: &#8220;The unresponsive socialist house drives the first nail. The destruction of our freedom, prosperity, and future was passed narrowly, 220-215. While illegal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: publius772000</title>
		<link>http://theconstitutionalalamo.com/2009/11/08/220-215-the-unresponsive-socialist-house-drives-the-first-nail/#comment-1002</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[publius772000]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theconstitutionalalamo.com/?p=1005#comment-1002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The liberal response to the Constitutionality of socialism is the &quot;general welfare&quot; clause of the Preamble.  Madison and his compatriots made it very clear in their writings that &quot;general welfare&quot; does not mean the federal government is to do anything outside what is defined in their enumerated powers.  Pelosi, of course, when asked of her constitutional basis for health care reform, just gave a haughty look and asked, &quot;Are you serious?&quot;  Yes, ma&#039;am.  We are.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The liberal response to the Constitutionality of socialism is the &#8220;general welfare&#8221; clause of the Preamble.  Madison and his compatriots made it very clear in their writings that &#8220;general welfare&#8221; does not mean the federal government is to do anything outside what is defined in their enumerated powers.  Pelosi, of course, when asked of her constitutional basis for health care reform, just gave a haughty look and asked, &#8220;Are you serious?&#8221;  Yes, ma&#8217;am.  We are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B. Johnson</title>
		<link>http://theconstitutionalalamo.com/2009/11/08/220-215-the-unresponsive-socialist-house-drives-the-first-nail/#comment-1000</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[B. Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theconstitutionalalamo.com/?p=1005#comment-1000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given the federal Constitution is silent about public healthcare, the federal government has no constitutional authority to regulate healthcare.  Please consider the writings by constitutional experts on this issue.

First, contrary to what Pelosi and other constitutionally-impaired lawmakers might think, Congress has no power to regulate intrastate commerce.

&quot;For the power given to Congress by the Constitution does not extend to the internal regulation of the commerce of a State, (that is to say of the commerce between citizen and citizen,) which remain exclusively with its own legislature; but to its external commerce only, that is to say, its commerce with another State, or with foreign nations, or with the Indian tribes.&quot; --Thomas Jefferson, Jefferson&#039;s Opinion on the Constitutionality of a National Bank : 1791. http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/bank-tj.asp

Next, the USSC has already tested the idea of Congress regulating medicine, deciding against Congress.

&quot;Direct control of medical practice in the states is obviously beyond the power of Congress.&quot; --Linder v. United States, 1925.    http://supreme.justia.com/us/268/5/case.html 

One reason that the corrupt federal government has greatly overstepped its constitutional limits in healthcare issues is this.  Pro-big federal government, outcome-driven justices nominated by FDR perverted the reasonable interpretation of the Commerce clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) in the 1940s.

The bottom line is that the Congressmen who vote yes on Obamacare will make a handy list of lawmakers who need to be charged with treason for blatantly violating their oaths to defend the Constitution.

Finally, the following words of Thomas Jefferson are appropriate for the HoR&#039;s exercising of constitutionally nonexistent federal government powers where Obamacare legislation is concerned.

&quot;Where powers are assumed which have not been delegated, a nullification of the act is the rightful remedy.&quot; --Thomas Jefferson: Draft Kentucky Resolutions, 1798. http://tinyurl.com/oozoo]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the federal Constitution is silent about public healthcare, the federal government has no constitutional authority to regulate healthcare.  Please consider the writings by constitutional experts on this issue.</p>
<p>First, contrary to what Pelosi and other constitutionally-impaired lawmakers might think, Congress has no power to regulate intrastate commerce.</p>
<p>&#8220;For the power given to Congress by the Constitution does not extend to the internal regulation of the commerce of a State, (that is to say of the commerce between citizen and citizen,) which remain exclusively with its own legislature; but to its external commerce only, that is to say, its commerce with another State, or with foreign nations, or with the Indian tribes.&#8221; &#8211;Thomas Jefferson, Jefferson&#8217;s Opinion on the Constitutionality of a National Bank : 1791. <a href="http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/bank-tj.asp" rel="nofollow">http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/bank-tj.asp</a></p>
<p>Next, the USSC has already tested the idea of Congress regulating medicine, deciding against Congress.</p>
<p>&#8220;Direct control of medical practice in the states is obviously beyond the power of Congress.&#8221; &#8211;Linder v. United States, 1925.    <a href="http://supreme.justia.com/us/268/5/case.html" rel="nofollow">http://supreme.justia.com/us/268/5/case.html</a> </p>
<p>One reason that the corrupt federal government has greatly overstepped its constitutional limits in healthcare issues is this.  Pro-big federal government, outcome-driven justices nominated by FDR perverted the reasonable interpretation of the Commerce clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) in the 1940s.</p>
<p>The bottom line is that the Congressmen who vote yes on Obamacare will make a handy list of lawmakers who need to be charged with treason for blatantly violating their oaths to defend the Constitution.</p>
<p>Finally, the following words of Thomas Jefferson are appropriate for the HoR&#8217;s exercising of constitutionally nonexistent federal government powers where Obamacare legislation is concerned.</p>
<p>&#8220;Where powers are assumed which have not been delegated, a nullification of the act is the rightful remedy.&#8221; &#8211;Thomas Jefferson: Draft Kentucky Resolutions, 1798. <a href="http://tinyurl.com/oozoo" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/oozoo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aly</title>
		<link>http://theconstitutionalalamo.com/2009/11/08/220-215-the-unresponsive-socialist-house-drives-the-first-nail/#comment-999</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theconstitutionalalamo.com/?p=1005#comment-999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Naratopia here I come.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naratopia here I come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

