Ah, what a difference a Commander-in-Chief makes!  Olbermann’s views on those who disagree with the government’s military policy have changed a bit since Barack Obama has slid into the Oval Office chair.

by Michael Naragon

On Tuesday, Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook’s orders to head for Afghanistan were revoked.  Under normal circumstances, this would not make for remarkable news.  Maj. Cook, however, has refused to deploy until Barack Obama produces credible proof that he is indeed a natural-born citizen of the United States.  Maj. Cook and his attorney Orly Taitz have voiced concerns that, if Obama’s legitimacy is questionable, Maj. Cook may not be protected by the Geneva accords, as he will have been sent to war illegally.

Interestingly, the military revoked the order rather than fight Maj. Cook’s refusal.  Keith Olbermann, in a desire to remain current, called Maj. Cook and Taitz his “worst people in the world,” categorizing Maj. Cook as a coward for questioning the legitimacy of his commander.

With the previous administration in charge, Olbermann seemed to view objectors in a different light.  The second video below is from 2007 in which the Countdown anchor chronicled the famous reunion of an Iraq War veteran with his wife and two sons.  Unable to refrain from politicizing such an event, Olbermann describes what “supporting the troops” truly entails, and, as he explains, it is not “thumping a chest and waving a flag and threatening a dissenter.”  Dissenters who refuse to follow the orders of our de facto president, however, are evidently fair game.