How one could not take a good look at that sign is questionable. Thanks for enlightening us as to who is currently serving in the Oval Office. The sign, however, was obviously not so much a scathing review of Obama as it was a sacrilegious attempt at nudging their guy in their chosen direction. No president has been more receptive to the idea of squelching productivity in favor of extremist environmental concerns than Obama. Greenpeace obviously knows this as well.

You’re right about one thing: no recent politician, with the possible exception of Reagan, has truly been a leader. Their pictures are also not being placed on Mt. Rushmore. Obama just happens to be the epitome of the talking head, and, as you have so intelligently pointed out, he is the current president, and his picture is on the banner, so he gets the brunt of my written assault.

“He cannot speak without prompts, cannot make decisions without polls, cannot lead without consensus,” basically describes every single politician for the last forty years or more.

Secondly, you didn’t take a good look at the sign, they’re not giving Obama any love, they’re trying to get him to support their cause because he hasn’t been so far. His picture is on it because he’s the president.